PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 15.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -102.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-28.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -7.72%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
140.76%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -136.41%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
19.70%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QCOM's 136.77%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
137.50%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -42.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
291.67%
AP growth well above QCOM's 128.57%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
205.85%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -206.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-110.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -1022.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
87.79%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -89.94%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -45.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.18%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. QCOM's 98.57%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-7.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -58.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-27.27%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 3.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.87%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 120.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6000.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -1494.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -27.94%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-9.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -74.21%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.