PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-73.23%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -80.58%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.44%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
8050.00%
Well above QCOM's 128.27% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-16.67%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -10.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
601.24%
Well above QCOM's 259.30% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
382.08%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -112.39%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-225.64%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -128.57%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
48.94%
Lower AP growth vs. QCOM's 271.64%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
346.96%
Growth well above QCOM's 164.06%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
2900.00%
Well above QCOM's 92.77%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
12.02%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 2847.56%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-24.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -48.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24.19%
Some acquisitions while QCOM is negative at -652.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-19.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 52.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-14.13%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 250.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-25.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -211.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-84.02%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 1806.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.16%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. QCOM's 304.88%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-8.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -5.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.