PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 106.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.75%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 6.89%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
103.23%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -103.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
5.71%
SBC growth while QCOM is negative at -10.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
132.91%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -131.30%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
44.89%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -183.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
40.21%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -50.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
111.76%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -6.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
306.80%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -72.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
17.65%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QCOM's 341.86%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
64.21%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -70.72%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-31.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 18.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 97.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-5.50%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 88.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5975.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -80.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-130.45%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 245.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-16.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 11.11%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.