PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.74%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 235.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.29%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 6.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-5300.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-37.84%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -14.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
94.19%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 312.65%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
64.95%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QCOM's 177.21%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
55.17%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -97.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
750.00%
AP growth well above QCOM's 181.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
1.97%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 30.17%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
95.24%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -191.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.33%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 297.87%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-48.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -15.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
48.59%
Acquisition spending well above QCOM's 54.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-155.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.73%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -70.73%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-58.02%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2082.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -76.09%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -128.54%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-46.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -74.13%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-17.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -400.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.