PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -140.44%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.47%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -4.35%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
55.77%
Well above QCOM's 6.55% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-8.70%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 18.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
104.98%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -142.40%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1211.76%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -29.79%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-288.46%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 4500.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-125.49%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -6.05%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
13.87%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -399.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1150.00%
Well above QCOM's 269.36%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
1.85%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -121.24%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.70%
Lower CapEx growth vs. QCOM's 25.70%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-12.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -509.09%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
89.25%
Purchases well above QCOM's 19.84%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
26.12%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -90.09%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
15.36%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 100500.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
185.12%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 55.73%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.91%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 315.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-67.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -2015.50%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.