PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.23%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -37.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.49%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -2.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
675.00%
Well above QCOM's 55.51% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
9.84%
SBC growth while QCOM is negative at -3.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
139.52%
Well above QCOM's 93.18% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.01%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -151.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-39.53%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -72.22%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
61.19%
Lower AP growth vs. QCOM's 157.07%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
154.92%
Growth well above QCOM's 95.17%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-320.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -154.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
62.24%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 123.03%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-13.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -11.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.40%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 269.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-87.37%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 25.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1890.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -150.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-121.99%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 28.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x QCOM's 15.47%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-3.31%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 432.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
25.09%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.