PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.72%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 82.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 43.04%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
53.66%
SBC growth while QCOM is negative at -13.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-247.40%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -190.28%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-190.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -235.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-105.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -104.62%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
303.45%
AP growth well above QCOM's 325.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-505.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -297.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-190.91%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 42.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-51.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -8.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.23%
Lower CapEx growth vs. QCOM's 6.62%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -11.94%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
68.79%
Purchases well above QCOM's 64.25%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
437.05%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 307.89%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
96.79%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -60.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
143.00%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 39.76%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
0.13%
Debt repayment well below QCOM's 66.77%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
204.17%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -84.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-235.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -8.09%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.