PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.55%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -49.41%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.40%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -3.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
11.76%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -67.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
9.52%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 5.10%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
106.69%
Well above QCOM's 78.82% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
157.85%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -31.68%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-6550.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -1547.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
23.73%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -9.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
87.54%
Growth well above QCOM's 150.62%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
125.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QCOM's 845.45%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
102.12%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -3.13%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.25%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -16.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.46%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 536.71%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
10.50%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -34.84%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-2380.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -1854.35%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
73.97%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -671.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
33.24%
Debt repayment growth of 33.24% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-40.41%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 556.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
46.25%
We have some buyback growth while QCOM is negative at -107.09%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.