PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.40%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 6.76%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-70.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 50.23%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -4.21%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-630.56%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 1277.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-254.29%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 456.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
148.12%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -128.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-117.81%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -102.79%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
40.91%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -31.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.00%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -197.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-16.10%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 72.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-12.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -21.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
12.31%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. QCOM's 41.51%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-920.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -1124.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-71.82%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 647.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-28.23%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 104.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-252.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -101.53%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -467.92%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
41.38%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -98.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
98.30%
Similar buyback growth to QCOM's 93.03%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.