PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.15%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -28.23%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.49%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 6.32%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-112.50%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
13.11%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 7.65%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
67.77%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 503.23%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
95.88%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QCOM's 666.67%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-38.46%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -296.77%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-124.64%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 25.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
52.00%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -222.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-2750.00%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 43.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.65%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -8.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-25.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -2.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.83%
Purchases well above QCOM's 13.52%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
22.75%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 5.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-1878.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -121.95%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
111.45%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -52.41%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x QCOM's 6.97%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-72.45%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-46.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -242.57%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.