PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.95%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 21.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.47%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -4.47%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
75.00%
Well above QCOM's 140.71% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
48.00%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 16.71%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-572.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -9.84%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-95.83%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 27.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-219.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -464.60%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
120.37%
Lower AP growth vs. QCOM's 1597.83%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-181.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -40.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-500.00%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 74.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.04%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 90.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
65.44%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -35.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-97.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -155.91%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-7.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -15.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
2.44%
Below 50% of QCOM's 5.78%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
50.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 617.52%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
25.17%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -324.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -1.43%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
9.62%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-314.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -52.79%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.