PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 27.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.17%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 2.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
78.57%
Well above QCOM's 125.04% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-20.00%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 3.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
126.17%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -171.63%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
137.97%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QCOM's 706.38%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-47.48%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -23.61%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
121.05%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -115.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
227.40%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -530.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
83.24%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QCOM's 673.53%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
56.45%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QCOM's 7.30%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-32.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -12.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -8810.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-76.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 20.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.79%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -2.07%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-112.20%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 173.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-272.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -827.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-39.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 45.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
39.29%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -99.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
15.74%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 47.42%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.