PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -22.24%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.84%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -18.78%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
95.38%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -225.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
67.74%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 21.69%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-9488.89%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 99.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-87.59%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 191.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-50.42%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 49.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-464.71%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -1536.36%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-236.97%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 145.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1.59%
Growth of 1.59% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
-43.19%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 114.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-1.55%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 37.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.30%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 84.83%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
10.30%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -66.67%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
81.82%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 945.45%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
102.73%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 54.14%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 50.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
70.00%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
87.85%
We have some buyback growth while QCOM is negative at -154.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.