PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.82%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -25.12%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.76%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 18.09%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-550.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
6.73%
SBC growth while QCOM is negative at -0.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
40.90%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -23125.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-538.89%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -84.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
16.95%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 116.81%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
159.68%
AP growth well above QCOM's 13.45%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
71.68%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -540.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-177.42%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 212.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.60%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -52.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-47.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -13.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-23.87%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 25.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
1150.00%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -97.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-8617.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -68.42%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
64.21%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -112.74%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-23.53%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
23.30%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of QCOM's 28.90%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.