PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -6.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.31%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -3.55%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-41.41%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-13.92%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -0.98%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4766.67%
Well above QCOM's 347.63% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1045.00%
AR growth well above QCOM's 523.57%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
49.16%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -1.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-137.04%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -43.79%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
15.66%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 2359.26%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
112.12%
Well above QCOM's 135.55%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-0.67%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 53.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.21%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 4.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-400.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -178.26%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
16.72%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -311.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
18.23%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -27.94%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-20.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -100.43%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
81.64%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -135.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.82%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 20000.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-41.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.