PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -19.07%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.25%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -5.95%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-19.72%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 25.69%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.43%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 17.11%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
108.15%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 517.99%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-134.48%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 228.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
72.62%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -1.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
232.47%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -25.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
96.78%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 604.94%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
102.42%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -203.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
54.47%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QCOM's 20.52%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
14.74%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 14.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-98.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -70.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
56.87%
Purchases well above QCOM's 4.27%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
18.97%
Below 50% of QCOM's 67.82%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
175.00%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -671.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.00%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 25.24%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
89.93%
Debt repayment above 1.5x QCOM's 0.25%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
281.54%
Issuance growth of 281.54% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2266.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 6.76%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.