PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.23%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -7.34%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.51%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 1.95%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
61.18%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -2.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-25.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -8.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-262.07%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -37.93%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-277.50%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -69.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-726.09%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -57.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-87.25%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 51.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2910.00%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -37.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-1166.67%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 70.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
10.25%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -14.12%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -110.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 32.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
12.06%
Purchases well above QCOM's 5.47%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-13.74%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -6.69%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-186.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 105.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-993.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -129.07%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-52.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -99.49%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-347.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -78.25%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.