PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 38.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.21%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 4.77%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
36.36%
Well above QCOM's 32.04% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-10.34%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 8.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
738.30%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -218.48%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
194.70%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -866.67%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-21.58%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -656.52%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
569.23%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -103.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
7.12%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 104.30%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
103.13%
Well above QCOM's 72.86%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
15.36%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -13.27%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
9.42%
Lower CapEx growth vs. QCOM's 33.85%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.73%
Purchases well above QCOM's 30.52%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 10.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
10542.31%
Growth well above QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
226.08%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 63.09%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
90.85%
Debt repayment similar to QCOM's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-25.64%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 18600.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-68.87%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.