PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.16%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.53%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -0.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-314.29%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 146.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
48.72%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 8.90%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-341.33%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 103.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-198.60%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 139.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
30.74%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 128.91%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-239.08%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 222.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-200.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -191.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-6000.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -257.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-57.51%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 73.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
5.79%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -8.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.82%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -5.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.34%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 1725.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
104.07%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -74.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-150.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
35.63%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-21.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -34.31%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.