205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.69%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -18.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-34.71%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -4.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
61.29%
Well above QRVO's 82.51% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-378.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.43%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -67.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
23.08%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-38.66%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -8.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-17.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -31.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-17600.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
57.02%
Purchases growth of 57.02% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
23.51%
Liquidation growth of 23.51% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.54%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -134.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -13.26%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-65.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.