205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.75%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -18.40%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -4.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-7.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 82.51%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.52%
Negative yoy SBC while QRVO is 54.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
56.25%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
183.87%
AR growth well above QRVO's 34.56%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-62.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -67.12%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.58%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
255.56%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
20.02%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -8.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-92.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -31.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.01%
Purchases growth of 5.01% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
300.00%
Liquidation growth of 300.00% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.47%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -134.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -13.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-40.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.