205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.87%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -18.40%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.79%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -4.69%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
36.36%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. QRVO's 82.51%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
4.26%
Less SBC growth vs. QRVO's 54.93%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-129.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
25.10%
AR growth well above QRVO's 34.56%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
1.35%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -67.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-233.33%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-97.81%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.85%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -8.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-29.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -31.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.04%
Liquidation growth of 43.04% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
500.00%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -134.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to QRVO's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.81%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.