205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
68.30%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -18.40%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.61%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -4.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
625.00%
Well above QRVO's 82.51% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-7.25%
Negative yoy SBC while QRVO is 54.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-10.48%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-339.68%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 34.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
64.84%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -67.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-251.35%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.86%
Growth well above QRVO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.33%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -8.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-41.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -31.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above QRVO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-70.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.18%
Liquidation growth of 43.18% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -97.66%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
18.89%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -134.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-91.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-73.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -13.26%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.