205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
75.78%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -18.40%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
466.67%
Well above QRVO's 82.51% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-221.88%
Negative yoy SBC while QRVO is 54.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
110.78%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
111.92%
AR growth well above QRVO's 34.56%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
215.63%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -67.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
3.85%
AP growth of 3.85% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
17.28%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QRVO's 100.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-48.98%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
78.07%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -8.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-2.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -31.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-257.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-78.12%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-548.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -134.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
13.04%
Debt repayment well below QRVO's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-7.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -13.26%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.