205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-66.33%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -18.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.06%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -4.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-160.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 82.51%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
182.05%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 54.93%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
2892.00%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
2016.67%
AR growth well above QRVO's 34.56%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
145.95%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -67.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
277.60%
AP growth of 277.60% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-43.16%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1044.00%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.73%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -8.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
36.00%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -31.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.46%
Purchases growth of 55.46% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
194.30%
Liquidation growth of 194.30% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.88%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -134.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to QRVO's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
111.11%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -13.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.