205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.32%
Net income growth of 82.32% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
-2.24%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-460.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.08%
Working capital change of 23.08% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-42.86%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-135.09%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
85.25%
AP growth of 85.25% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
9.62%
Growth of 9.62% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-50.00%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
87.22%
CFO growth of 87.22% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-15.48%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-248.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
264.42%
Liquidation growth of 264.42% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-638.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
1309.09%
We expand invests by 1309.09% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.45%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-6.19%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.