PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 91.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.96%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 18.61%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
155.56%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. QRVO's 1028.26%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-5.33%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -7.48%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
131.94%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -450.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
81.25%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -2343.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
70.00%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -117.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
52.78%
AP growth of 52.78% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
261.70%
Growth of 261.70% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
833.33%
Well above QRVO's 748.17%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
70.77%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 2160.97%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-27.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -23.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
27.84%
Acquisition growth of 27.84% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
58.49%
Purchases growth of 58.49% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-69.92%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-24.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -201.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-168.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -326.75%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.75%
Issuance growth of 1.75% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-1.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 98.85%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.