PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.76%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -1006.10%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.67%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 5.37%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
73.33%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -117.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-7.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -24.20%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
242.42%
Well above QRVO's 115.73% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1160.00%
AR growth well above QRVO's 101.88%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
16.67%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 81.64%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
176.47%
AP growth of 176.47% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-91.45%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-390.91%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -118.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
4.17%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -75.82%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
13.71%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -52.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-13.71%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.81%
Purchases growth of 5.81% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
0.15%
Liquidation growth of 0.15% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
35.54%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QRVO's 94.95%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
41.98%
Investing outflow well above QRVO's 51.30%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.86%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.