PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 109.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.08%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -1.10%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-171.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 189.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
18.18%
Less SBC growth vs. QRVO's 40.90%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-214.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -357.28%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-146.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -1834.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
440.00%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -166.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1000.00%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-1161.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -111.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
117.19%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -57.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-61.47%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -30.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.04%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -30.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-43.97%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
14.60%
Liquidation growth of 14.60% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
148.72%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QRVO's 2061.76%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-147.97%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 118.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.45%
Issuance growth of 68.45% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
1.91%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -2570.97%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.