205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.25%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 277.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-0.97%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -4.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-54.05%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.28%
Negative yoy SBC while QRVO is 10.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
34.11%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -38.24%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-10.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -372.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-276.47%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 483.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
49.57%
AP growth of 49.57% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
99.28%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -622.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
81.82%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QRVO's 194.27%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
67.75%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 196.98%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-3.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 38.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.51%
Purchases growth of 60.51% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
64.84%
Liquidation growth of 64.84% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-302.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -103.88%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
362.95%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -538.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-55.83%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-3.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -606.40%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.