PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.94%
Net income growth above 1.5x QRVO's 5.82%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.33%
Less D&A growth vs. QRVO's 1.65%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
52.63%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -1615.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-19.48%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -53.22%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
165.88%
Well above QRVO's 323.71% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
125.45%
AR growth well above QRVO's 221.13%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
76.67%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -64.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
18.64%
AP growth of 18.64% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
18200.00%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -28.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
130.00%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -160.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
78.45%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 227.17%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-28.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 6.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
28.75%
Acquisition growth of 28.75% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-69.64%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-68.16%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-18.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -3061.20%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-147.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -200.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x QRVO's 6.25%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-45.60%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
9.83%
Buyback growth below 50% of QRVO's 90.15%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.