PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -116.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 119.78%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
185.19%
Well above QRVO's 98.02% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-3.23%
Negative yoy SBC while QRVO is 5.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
49.40%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -103.76%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
430.95%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -86.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-371.43%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 26.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
162.50%
AP growth of 162.50% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-82.87%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 100.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-517.39%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -119.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.03%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -54.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-21.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 49.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
21.36%
Acquisition growth of 21.36% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-33.10%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
15.29%
Liquidation growth of 15.29% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
68.13%
Growth well above QRVO's 98.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-28.20%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 119.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.88%
Issuance growth of 105.88% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.