PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.48%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 3794.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.95%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -53.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-95.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
30.00%
Less SBC growth vs. QRVO's 78.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-265.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -3983.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-169.06%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -854.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-81.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -269.38%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-460.00%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-400.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -9842.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
96.35%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QRVO's 499.37%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-52.12%
Negative yoy CFO while QRVO is 14.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.60%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -23.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
64.25%
Purchases well above QRVO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
29.47%
We have some liquidation growth while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
103.45%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -3376.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
132.18%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -373.41%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while QRVO is negative at -186076.60%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
75.71%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -12.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
4.01%
Buyback growth of 4.01% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.