205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 199.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.06%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -3.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
12.28%
Deferred tax of 12.28% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-21.43%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -56.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
231.82%
Well above QRVO's 36.09% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-17.50%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 108.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
378.05%
Inventory growth well above QRVO's 32.87%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-41.18%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
358.10%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -165.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-23.08%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -178.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
71.83%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 184.67%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-11.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -7.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
11.20%
Acquisition growth of 11.20% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
50.05%
Purchases growth of 50.05% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
13.95%
Liquidation growth of 13.95% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-14.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -476.39%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
323.56%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -223.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-31.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -50.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-20.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.