PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.76%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -96.59%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-8.42%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 877.16%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
202.00%
Deferred tax of 202.00% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-12.12%
Negative yoy SBC while QRVO is 922.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
51.38%
Less working capital growth vs. QRVO's 223.09%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
776.60%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QRVO's 1630.62%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-29.82%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 601.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
104.17%
AP growth of 104.17% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-85.61%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 90.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1175.00%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 10.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
1.49%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -17.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-17.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -478.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
17.99%
Acquisition growth of 17.99% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-129.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-55.41%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
56.06%
Growth well above QRVO's 100.05%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-273.52%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 155.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
214.29%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. QRVO's 828.23%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
20.63%
Buyback growth of 20.63% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.