PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -68.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-4.60%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -76.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-52.94%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 103.24%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
24.14%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 14.39%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-206.15%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -253.27%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-131.45%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -214.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-242.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -139.22%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 144.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-479.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -592.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
129.30%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QRVO's 690.70%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-54.34%
Negative yoy CFO while QRVO is 2.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.39%
CapEx growth well above QRVO's 25.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
81.02%
Purchases well above QRVO's 25.19%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
105.95%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QRVO's 12.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
94.83%
Growth well above QRVO's 81.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
184.89%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -196.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to QRVO's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-38.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -31.22%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-0.48%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 1.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.