205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.56%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 118.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.81%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 7.79%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-345.83%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.56%
SBC growth while QRVO is negative at -25.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
101.29%
Well above QRVO's 40.57% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
24.00%
AR growth well above QRVO's 44.23%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
37.72%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -39.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
137.50%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -52.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
177.03%
Growth well above QRVO's 123.16%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-60.32%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 7.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
63.71%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QRVO's 19.35%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-27.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 10.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-396.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -3.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
34.44%
Below 50% of QRVO's 169.10%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-4966.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -17.86%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-88.66%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 233.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.82%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -38.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
16.35%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -899.68%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.