205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.26%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -350.16%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.07%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 5.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-111.86%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-26.32%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -15.17%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4400.00%
Well above QRVO's 198.18% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-28.95%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 567.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
195.77%
Inventory growth well above QRVO's 56.31%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-76.92%
Both negative yoy AP, with QRVO at -835.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
155.26%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -196.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-72.00%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -0.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
32.18%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 29.15%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
12.03%
CapEx growth well above QRVO's 23.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-12.03%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1.51%
Some yoy expansion while QRVO is negative at -89.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-57.44%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QRVO at -92.05%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
7.89%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QRVO's 259.13%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-1027.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -306.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while QRVO is negative at -50.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-20.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -4.91%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
5.12%
Buyback growth below 50% of QRVO's 49.98%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.