205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.78%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 76.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.32%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -91.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
121.43%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -63.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
41.67%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 20.89%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -2157.86%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-140.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -293.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-394.44%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -58.32%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-232.20%
Both negative yoy AP, with QRVO at -2.89%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-996.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -571.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
80.84%
Well above QRVO's 131.12%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-42.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -62.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-15.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -54.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.17%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QRVO's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
46.41%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1618.55%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
126.27%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -90.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
138.98%
Investing outflow well above QRVO's 22.10%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
75.00%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of QRVO's 100.00%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
1441.67%
Stock issuance far above QRVO's 127.72%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-15.79%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.