205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.92%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 308.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.17%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 9.65%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-700.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
10.29%
SBC growth while QRVO is negative at -14.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
17.19%
Less working capital growth vs. QRVO's 138.49%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-94.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -14.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-96.23%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 161.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
115.38%
Lower AP growth vs. QRVO's 419.95%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
38.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QRVO's 109.27%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
131.25%
Well above QRVO's 6.59%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
15.35%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 320.95%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-18.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 8.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.27%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.95%
We have some liquidation growth while QRVO is negative at -91.98%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-561.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -27905.88%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-103.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -49.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-47.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -95.71%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-18.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.