205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -763.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Well above QRVO's 61.62% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-28.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -36.05%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
140.76%
Well above QRVO's 109.53% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
19.70%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QRVO's 177.17%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
137.50%
Inventory growth well above QRVO's 65.98%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
291.67%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -178.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
205.85%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QRVO's 2252.56%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-110.00%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -0.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
87.79%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -11.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -13.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.18%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. QRVO's 105.93%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-7.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.27%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-32.87%
We reduce yoy other investing while QRVO is 101.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6000.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -21.82%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-9.52%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 917.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.