PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-73.23%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 171.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.44%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 882.54%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
8050.00%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -42.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-16.67%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -6.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
601.24%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -104.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
382.08%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -9.99%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-225.64%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -182.99%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
48.94%
Lower AP growth vs. QRVO's 127.92%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
346.96%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -168.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2900.00%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -389.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
12.02%
Operating cash flow growth similar to QRVO's 12.12%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-24.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -21.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24.19%
Some acquisitions while QRVO is negative at -80.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-19.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-14.13%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-25.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -1622.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-84.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -22.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.16%
Stock issuance far above QRVO's 82.81%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-8.62%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 24.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.