PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
297.09%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -154.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.23%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -92.23%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-119.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 45.31%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
55.56%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 35.82%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-141.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -1259.51%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-158.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -125.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-97.96%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -56.43%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-172.86%
Both negative yoy AP, with QRVO at -127.91%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-118.17%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 103.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-282.14%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 137.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-42.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -58.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
18.18%
CapEx growth well above QRVO's 24.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
31.31%
Purchases growth of 31.31% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
84.18%
Liquidation growth of 84.18% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
98.32%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QRVO's 619.26%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
129.62%
Investing outflow well above QRVO's 29.75%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
9.88%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -0.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-23.65%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 37.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.