205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 217.29%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.75%
D&A growth well above QRVO's 1.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
103.23%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -165.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
5.71%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 11.04%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
132.91%
Well above QRVO's 82.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
44.89%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -442.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
40.21%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 125.60%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
111.76%
Lower AP growth vs. QRVO's 831.66%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
306.80%
Growth well above QRVO's 427.43%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
17.65%
Well above QRVO's 2.89%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
64.21%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of QRVO's 112.14%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-31.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 45.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-5.50%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5975.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -527.29%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-130.45%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 16.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -39.88%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-16.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -78.54%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.