PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.08%
Negative net income growth while QRVO stands at 62.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.47%
Less D&A growth vs. QRVO's 1147.18%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
55.77%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. QRVO's 122.77%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-8.70%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -28.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
104.98%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -60.70%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1211.76%
AR growth well above QRVO's 830.85%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-288.46%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -232.92%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-125.49%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 199.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
13.87%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -140.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1150.00%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -353.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
1.85%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -4.11%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.70%
Lower CapEx growth vs. QRVO's 29.19%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-12.70%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
89.25%
Purchases growth of 89.25% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
26.12%
Liquidation growth of 26.12% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
15.36%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -92.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
185.12%
Investing outflow well above QRVO's 0.28%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.91%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 65.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-67.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 36.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.