PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -139.92%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.61%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -92.53%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
117.39%
Some yoy growth while QRVO is negative at -705.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
45.24%
Less SBC growth vs. QRVO's 96.22%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-174.23%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -307.07%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-161.64%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -114.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
185.15%
Inventory growth well above QRVO's 39.45%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-415.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with QRVO at -168.31%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-169.12%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 24.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
19.05%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QRVO's 144.31%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-48.39%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -70.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
22.29%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -35.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
55.26%
Purchases growth of 55.26% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-26.77%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
96.62%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -860.93%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-22.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -254.28%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-48.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
297.37%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -35.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
42.66%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -96.19%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.