205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.23%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 206.97%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.49%
Less D&A growth vs. QRVO's 621.44%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
675.00%
Well above QRVO's 39.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
9.84%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 8.06%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
139.52%
Well above QRVO's 44.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.01%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -782.38%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-39.53%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 201.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
61.19%
Lower AP growth vs. QRVO's 357.41%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
154.92%
Growth well above QRVO's 85.20%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-320.00%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -150.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
62.24%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 185.06%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-13.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -60.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.40%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-87.37%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QRVO at -22.49%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-1890.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -24.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-121.99%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 79.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while QRVO is negative at -8.38%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-3.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -13.87%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
25.09%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x QRVO's 13.33%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.