PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.20%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 116.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.00%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -40.89%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-112.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 6.29%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.36%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -10.91%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
24.31%
Less working capital growth vs. QRVO's 201.72%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
266.67%
AR growth well above QRVO's 154.21%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-25.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -77.05%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
211.54%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -136.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-40.30%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -27.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
141.82%
Well above QRVO's 126.32%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
10.91%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 55.32%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
47.54%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -2.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-47.54%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-312.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.00%
We have some liquidation growth while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
32.42%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QRVO's 93.11%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-254.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -218.96%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.88%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -17.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
47.16%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -75.35%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.