PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.91%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -11.51%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-9.09%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -34.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
1350.00%
Well above QRVO's 21.64% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-14.58%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -31.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
62.22%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -104.18%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
248.05%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -39.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 171.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
8.75%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -107.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-195.65%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -70.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-11.95%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -43.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-9.40%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 50.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
9.40%
Acquisition growth of 9.40% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-109.94%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
38.64%
Liquidation growth of 38.64% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-5.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -808.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-110.18%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 42.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.26%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 124.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-7.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -96.98%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.