PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.55%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 110.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-0.40%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -9.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
11.76%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. QRVO's 113.60%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
9.52%
SBC growth while QRVO is negative at -16.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
106.69%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -157.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
157.85%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -236.63%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-6550.00%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 457.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
23.73%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -157.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
87.54%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -44.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
125.00%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -82.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
102.12%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -32.56%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.25%
CapEx growth well above QRVO's 24.36%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.46%
Purchases growth of 61.46% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
10.50%
We have some liquidation growth while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-2380.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while QRVO is 144.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
73.97%
Investing outflow well above QRVO's 86.80%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
33.24%
Debt repayment well below QRVO's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-40.41%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 15.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
46.25%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -64.91%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.